2 comments

The year in review: 2009

Posted by Casson on Dec 31, 2009 in Fishing and Farming, ICCAT, Mashiko, News and Announcements
da

Days gone by

It’s been quite a year.

As the last few heartbeats of the year 2009 fade away, it is natural to take stock of how far we have come.  It’s important to recognize our victories, as well as to isolate and examine our shortcomings.  After all, there’s certainly no need to make the same mistakes again in 2010.

I’m also happy to say that it was Sustainable Sushi‘s first birthday at some point in the last few weeks.  Over this past year, this website has afforded me with the opportunity not only to explore many  fascinating issues, but to discuss them with people commenting from all across the globe.  It has been a wonderful experience, and I thank you all so very much for helping to make it happen.

So, 2009: a tumultuous year by any standard.  The oceans have had a tough time of it, but in other ways, we’ve achieved more than we could have possibly hoped for.

There have been times over the past twelve months when things have seemed bleak.  It is beyond debate that the oceans took some major blows this year, and some of the ominous clouds on the horizon have grown even darker:

  • das

    We will rue the day

    The Copenhagen climate change conference missed the mark and fell short of setting any global reasonable emissions goals, paving the way for the increased acidification of the world’s oceans.

At the same time, we’ve seen some incredible successes this year.  All across the planet, people stood up for the oceans, bringing their passion for a better planet with them as they cooked, shopped, wrote, worked and marched:

  • dsas

    Unwanted attention

    The End of the Line, a documentary on overfishing and the state of the world’s oceans, was released.  This led to increased pressure on Nobu restaurant to discontinue the sale of endangered Northern bluefin.  This momentum manifest in celebrity petitions, dozens of articles in trade and mainstream press, and a Greenpeace campaign.

  • It's finally over

    It's finally over

    The Cove, a shocking documentary about the Taiji dolphin slaughter, was released worldwide.  Broome, Australia, discontinued its sister-city relationship with Taiji over the fiasco.  Taiji has temporarily halted its dolphin drive, but other communities in Japan continue to hunt dolphins.  The Cove has even been nominated for an Academy Award for “Best Documentary.”

  • 2009 marked the first year in a world beyond the grindadrap: the annual Faeroese pilot whale drive that had caused much consternation among environmentalists.  In response to warnings by their chief medical advisors, the Faeroese practice of slaughtering pilot whales and distributing the meat throughout the community was halted permanently in November of 2008.

The majority of these positive changes are part of a greater pattern: an accelerating increase in our overall awareness of the problems faced by our oceans.  Movies, magazine articles, and activist campaigns have brought the health of our fisheries to the headlines and to the tips of our tongues.  The amount of conversations we are having at coffee shops, in grocery stores, and around backyard barbecues about seafood sustainability and environmentally responsible fish consumption has never been higher – and rising faster than ever before.

Stand and fight

Stand and fight

Yes, it’s true that the bluefin tuna is in dire straits.  It is true that eel poaching continues unabated, that bottom trawlers still prowl the seas, and that we are on pace to empty the oceans of all seafood in less than forty years.  Still, as menacing as these threats are, they are not the most important issues at hand.

The single most powerful and meaningful thing that happened to our oceans this year is that we truly began to wake up to the truth of what we are doing to our planet.  We are more aware.  We are more alert.  And we are much more energized and focused.

Hundreds of new ocean activists are standing up every day to make a difference.  Maybe they write a check, or they buy a different kind of fish, or they have a conversation with a chef or grocer.  Maybe they simply have coffee with a good friend and spread the word.  It doesn’t matter – it all helps.  Every day we come closer to achieving critical mass, a fully realized awareness that will mobilize our true potential to save our oceans.

Brave New World

A brave new world

So let’s make 2010 the year that we redouble our efforts.  It is time to capitalize on our momentum and push even harder, accomplish even more for the sake of planet and our future.  There is still a tremendous amount of work to do, but make no mistake: we are stronger than the forces that would hold us back.  And on those particularly gloomy days, when bad news comes crashing down and the future looks insurmountably bleak, just remember: you are not alone.  We’re all in this together – you, me, and the millions of other people that are out there fighting every single day, working to make this world a better place for all of us.

Take heart — we are winning.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 
0

National solutions, International problems

Posted by Casson on Jun 15, 2009 in Uncategorized
Hail to the Reefs

Hail to the reefs

On Friday, June 12, 2009, President Barack Obama announced “National Oceans Month.”  This was a powerful gesture, and will no doubt serve to increase awareness of our current plight.  I applaud the President for making a public statement about this tremendously important issue.  Quoting directly from the proclamation: “we celebrate these vast spaces and the myriad ways they sustain life. We also pledge to preserve them and commend all those who are engaged in efforts to meet this end.”

Hear, hear!

But, alas — I wouldn’t be a blogger if I didn’t use my little cyber-soapbox to pick, prod, and critique.  So, in the spirit of constructive criticism, I’d like to point out a minor issue that I feel merits a bit of discussion:

There is no such thing as a “national ocean.”

What, this isn't good enough?

Now, I can already hear the whistling of the incoming artillery that my snarky little comment has invited.  “It’s a month about national recognition for the oceans, not recognition for national oceans,” or “He’s only the  President of one country, he can only make national statements.”  I know, I know.  But bear with me for a minute.

It’s not that I don’t feel that “National Oceans Month” is important.  It is.  I’m ecstatic that President Obama has taken the time to affix federal letterhead to his views on our planet’s seas.  It is, as I opined earlier, a very good thing.

The problem is that oceans are not national.  They are the very definition, in fact, of international.  And national proclamations won’t fix them.

Blue ocean, red ocean

Blue ocean, red ocean

The reasons behind many of our ocean’s most imposing environmental challenges are international in nature.  Ocean acidification, a creeping decrease in pH that spawns from climate change, pollution, and overfishing, is not the fault of any one country, nor can it be solved by any one government.  Solving this problem will take the cooperative action of all the world’s nations.

Bluefin tuna, a favorite punching-bag subject of mine, is similar in nature.  The bluefin is a migratory, pelagic species.  It does not spend its entire life within the exclusive economic zone of any one country.  International agreements that are in place to “manage” it continue to fail in any number of ways.  For example, ICCAT (the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas) is a multi-state body tasked with managing bluefin tuna stocks in the Mediterranean and surrounding waters.  Unfortunately, it has proven to be a toothless paper tiger whose enforcement prowess is somewhere between the Keystone Cops and the guy who sends you to jail in Monopoly.

Arrr! We've come fer yer orange roughy!

Arrr! We've come fer yer orange roughy!

Pirate fishing in the Southern Ocean, across the South Pacific, and along the African coast is perpetrated by ships from dozens of countries, many flying flags of convenience.   These illegal catches are taken from flagging fish stocks and are landed in backwater ports where many strangely well-off harbormasters have a curious amnesia when it comes to remembering to record landings in log books.

Addressing these types of issues through the instrument of national policy will land only a glancing blow at best.  If President Obama truly wants to be a leader in the realm of ocean conservation (and I, for one, believe he does), he needs to approach these issues from an international perspective.

Ocean acidification?  Get real on climate change.  Go to Copenhagen in December willing to make a real commitment.  Throw out the ineffectual Waxman-Markey Bill and actually work with the international community to reduce carbon emissions by a meaningful amount.

Put me down!  I'm endangered!

Put me down! I'm endangered!

Bluefin tuna?  Sponsor its inclusion under CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species).  That will tighten our import regulations as well as give the patrols in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean the power and resources they need to save this animal from total extinction.

Pirate fishing?  Push for international agreements that require chain-of-custody documentation for the seafood trade.  Promote the development of international certification standards that require full transparency.  Hold countries like Liberia, the Bahamas, and Panama responsible for the illegal actions of ships that are registered under their flags.  And most importantly, lead an international effort to establish no-take zones in spawning grounds and environmentally sensitive areas throughout the world’s oceans.

It's an international ball game

It’s true, Obama can only speak for one country, not for the world.  But addressing ocean conservation this way underscores the unfortunate tendency of the United States government to approach climate change and other mammoth (no pun intended) issues from a unilateral perspective.  This indefensible promotion of environmental isolationism is precisely the perspective the White House was employing when Reagan dismissed UNCLOS, not to mention when Bush emasculated Kyoto.

Last time I checked, the United States still carried a pretty big stick in the international arena.  If our government got serious about the idea that our globe is in fact global, we could make major changes… we might even be able to heal our oceans.

It’s great to have a National Oceans Month — it’s an important step, and it’s a whole lot better than nothing.  But if we’re serious about this, it needs to be International… and it needs to be a Year.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Copyright © 2010 SustainableSushi.net. All Rights Reserved.
Original Theme by Lorelei Web Design.